Law no. 213 of 30 December 2023 (Budget Law<\/u> for 2024) provided for an increase in estate tax rates on foreign properties.
\nIn particular, as of 2024, IVIE<\/u>\u2019s rate increases from the previous 0.76% to 1.06%; IVAFE<\/u>\u2019s rate increases from the previous 0.2% to 0.4%, but only with respect to financial products held in blacklisted Countries.<\/p>\n2. Italian participation exemption regime extended to non-resident companies<\/h2>\n
Law no. 213 of 30 December 2023 (Budget Law 2024) extends the Italian participation exemption regime<\/u> (i.e.<\/em> 95% exemption on capital gains on shares where certain conditions are met) to non-resident companies without a permanent establishment in Italy with respect to capital gains realized on Italian based companies. In addition, the participation sold:<\/p>\n The Italian Supreme Court<\/u> decision no. 35284 of 18 December 2023 ruled on the tax treatment of employment income received by a person resident in the United Arab Emirates. The Italian Tax Authorities<\/u>, with its statement of practice no. 76 of 22 December 2023, clarified that capital gains realised by foreign CIVs<\/u>, pension funds and other foreign institutional investors located in white-listed Countries (according to the Ministerial Decree 4 September 1996) on the sale of units of Italian real estate CIVs are exempted from Italian capital gain taxes, pursuant to Article 5(5) of Legislative Decree no. 461\/97. The Italian Tax Authorities, in its ruling<\/u> no. 486 of 29 December 2023, clarified that the Italian tax consolidation regime<\/u> may continue to apply in case of cross-border merger in which an Italian company Beta is merged into the French company Alfa (outside of the Italian tax consolidation regime), provided that, after the merger, the assets of Beta constitutes a permanent establishment of Alfa in Italy. The European Court of Justice<\/u> rejected the Commission\u2019s appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case C-457\/21. The following regulations has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 15 December 2023:<\/p>\n
\nIn order for the exemption to apply, the seller:<\/p>\n\n
\n
3. Italian sourced employment income derived by a non-Italian resident<\/h2>\n
\nAccording to the Supreme Court, Article 15(1) of the Italy-UAE Treaty should apply in a case where the employee is never present in the territory of the other State by granting the residence State exclusive right to tax.
\nMoreover, the legal rebuttable presumption<\/u> of tax residence<\/u> in Italy, arising from the transfer from Italy to a black-listed jurisdiction such as the UAE (Article 2(2-bis) of the TUIR), can be overthrown through the application of the criteria set out in Article 4 of the Italy-UAE Treaty.<\/p>\n4. Italian exemption on CIVs\u2019 quota sale<\/h2>\n
\nThis exemption still applies even if the Italian CIVs derives most of its value from real estate properties located in Italy.<\/p>\n5. Italian tax consolidation regime and cross-border merger<\/h2>\n
\nIn a similar case, the requirements to access the tax consolidation regime are still: with the merger, the consolidated company is \u201ctransformed\u201d from a company incorporated under Italian law (Beta) into a permanent establishment of a foreign entity (Alfa Italia), which is eligible to be part of the Italian tax unit pursuant to Article 117 of the TUIR.<\/p>\n6. The ECJ rules on the TP Amazon Case<\/h2>\n
\nThe issue concerned the tax ruling issued by the Luxembourg authorities to the Amazon group in relation to the treatment of two of its subsidiaries established in Luxembourg for corporate income tax purposes.
\nIn the view of the European Commission, the royalty paid by one subsidiary to the other under a licence agreement on the use of intangible assets artificially decreased the tax base of the first subsidiary and, thus, that of the Amazon group.
\nAccording to the ECJ, the Commission had not validly demonstrated the undue reduction of the tax burden.
\nThe appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the Commission had wrongly determined the \u201creference system\u201d (being the local transfer pricing regulation and not the OECD principles) for the purpose of qualifying the national measure as State aid.<\/p>\n7. New EU de minimis<\/em> rules issued<\/h2>\n